You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Bring torches and pitchforks to the antichrist justices of the 11th circuit

in #informationwar5 years ago

As said in the blog, many inmates are not lawyers. Many coming into the legal system are of low Iq (I cannot speak for this person). The jail is a large bureaucracy and names and departments are not easily found when you are confined to an itti bitty tiny living space. The jail also fails to provide writing material and stamps to pro-se litigants, so they often miss the opportunity to file timely responses.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/georgia/gandce/1:2017cv00685/235422/9/

In this case Sunday Boyejo v cobb county jail at al. is a case that mentions various claims. Use of force, inadequate medical, first amendment violations. But according to the order on the magistrates R & R it appears that she only was able to name one defendant,but didn't specify what his role was. They asked the plaintiff to amend the complaint, essentially refiled the same petition according to the court, and the Magistrate court moved to dismiss. She Objected to the R & R at the federal district court and finally but belatedly added new information and defendants. The Federal district court followed the magistrates R & R and dismissed the suit without prejudice-meaning she could refile. It should be noted that the court addresses Sunday Sunny as a he, so it could be one of those people.

Another thing about suing a jail, is you can't sue a building under section 1983. Many section 1983 plaintiff's try this, and although it should be common sense for a court to construe this to mean an official capacity suit against the sheriff, they tend to dismiss said buildings as defendants.

From the superior court, his/her charge might have been a terroristic threat. The warrant itself is sealed, like so many speech cases in Cobb. However there is an unsealed indictment that is as empty of specifics as possible. In another part of the docket, it reads that there was no bill on the indictments. It could be the prosecutor knew the original indictments were defective, but failed to find a second grand jury that would indict. Maybe it is a database error; All speculative at this point.