Bring torches and pitchforks to the antichrist justices of the 11th circuit

Per the author firstamendment: Readers have permission to republish anywhere in any forum, on any journal, on any news media. If you republish to steem, just watch out for the cheetah and steemitcleaner bots.
The US Marshals office doesn't like me criticizing and mocking their judges, and last time I met I told them that people need to speak out before things do get violent down there. Well what's going on down there isn't exactly violent, but people are dropping like flies when the 11th circuit chose to rewrite the state constitution by interpretation to give the Cobb County Sheriff sovereign immunity as they continue to worship a human authority while failing to protect our natural rights.

image source:google search results

I have held my tongue with the 11th circuit, they are far worse than the corrupt, uneducated, bias, Obama Judge Eleanor Ross and her family of criminals I had been criticizing and mocking. It is far to easy to cross into unprotected speech discussing the slithering reptiles occupying the 11th circuit-and I don't mean that in a David Icke way. Certainly with a headline like this, I could get visited by the US Marshals again, but hopefully, before they commence their intimidation tactic we can make clear that the people have a right to stand with torches and pitchforks in protest depending on local ordinances against fires-just don't do anything unlawful with them. If the Marshals were to think of that as some kind of intimidation; it is a more potent form of ensuring that these wealthy ivory towered aristocrats will hear the ore tenus briefs of the natural law by perhaps the people directly instead of hoping that an attorney finds a narrow window to have one voice and the court permits or even reads his briefs. Whether it is a single individual, hundreds, or tens of thousands, the people have a right to declare they are sick of the lawlessness of our courts and their willingness to remove the demonic serpents from the bench. Seriously though, I don't expect any to show up. To really have a voice these days you need big money, or at least be on big money's payroll. Nonetheless, People need to speak up or people will continue to die...ahem, needlessly and prematurely.

Image source: south park

When you hear about the 11th circuit, you may hear that it is a conservative pro-life circuit. But as Jesus reminds us, even the devil can cite scripture too. The federalist of the 11th circuit is just the republican variant of the antichrist-the democrats have legal positivist which are just as bad. The American people are being screwed by both parties-and we vote and celebrate for what we perceive to be the lesser evil. Sure the constitution guarantees you a right to a jury trial, but we have the Joe Biden family courts which operates as a star chamber, we also have a disproportional punishment system, plea lawyers, incompetent judges, and the trial penalty all to make sure you don't have a chance to defend your ideas or your innocence. The system is rigged so that you renounce all that is good in your life, say you are guilty, admit 2+2=5, just to temporarily get out of their evil clutches and extortion of your accuser (Satan is Hebrew for the accuser). In the end, a common man worshiping his false masters will have no family he can speak to, no kids in which to see, no attachments, no close friends, and finding himself not working for himself but for a political machine at a dead-end job. Then we pretend to not know why the suicide and substance abuse rates are so high, and fertility rates are so low. Men: Take your pick, which do you love more? Your country or your kids. Stop bowing to a false master, and if the family court judges keep you from seeing your kids then they need to learn to get the hell out of your way and reclaim that which is of the greatest value in our life-just don't hold me liable when you defend your family from the family court tyrants. We have the freedom of speech unless the Obama judges doesn't like your ideas and gives the cop qualified immunity through arguable probable cause. We have a lot of doublespeak going on as these antichrists forcefully take away our God-given rights that were to be protected through the bill of rights; the bill of fights having become increasingly legal fiction. You have a bill of rights, but it's not enforceable. Is this really America? Presently, it really is. How did it get this bad? Mostly the federalist; the remnant of the southern democrats who changed parties. What do these conservative conserve? They still want the south to win the civil war, and they are pretty close to achieving it. They are the democrats of 60 years ago and conserving their values of dominating and enslaving people they don't like on nothing more than an accusation. The #metoo movement of the right.

source:futurama, Matt Groening

These invaders will inevitably be met with lethal force unless they are stopped; Man always breaks free of his chains. It is just a question of how despotic will a regime be allowed to become before Man does. Hopefully not Communist China Bad, but we are pretty close now even if we ignore the abortion industry. And it remains to be seen, how bad China will be allowed to become.

Religion is the opiate of the masses Marx would say, but obvious communism cannot come up with better ideas than Islam so they choose re-education to get Muslims to renounce Islam or otherwise murders them to get rid of Islam. The greatest threat to despotism is a simple narrative similar to the biblical Adam and Eve where we understand true freedom in its purest form. Natural law extends further through reason in how we are expected to deal with others for our rational self-interest, and how we come together to form a society/government in self-defense. What it doesn't teach is that the government becomes a living organism seeking immortality that through force tramples on our natural right and engages in human sacrifices-quite overtly in the case of China. The sacrifices the beast consumed today are low targets in America: the vulnerable: the disappeared, and; people who don't have much voice-The people that a Christian nation has a duty to defend first. The government will continue to grow to master us all, or until the people rise up and put the present incarnation of the antichrist to death.
There is much the bible, specifically, the new testament and the Maccabees teaches of the natural law and the antichrists. So the government declared keep religion out of school, stop the churches from preaching politics, get the concepts of natural law out of the high school and college curriculum because we'll say it doesn't appeal to minorities and they'll call it racists. Oh, Government lovers will say Thomas Jefferson is racist too. Most people will not google for his original draft of the Declaration of independence. Just Scream racist, and end all debate about natural law and western values-let the left denounce natural law as the legal positivist ideals spoke by Pufendorf, instead of authorities like Locke. When it comes to a Christian Nation, the Dutch protestants, expanding upon Jesus saying "at least the pagans do that", adopting an idea from the fall of the Byzantine empire (Rather the Turkish Turban than the papal Tiara), was that a Christian nation has a duty to be better than the Roman heathens and Turkish Pagans. So for the dutch protestant, they would list all that the Romans and the Turks were allowed and not allowed to do to those they had custody over and declared that a Christian nation had to do better than this.
So we have the concept of feeding prisoners/slaves, providing medical attention, clothing them, allowing them visits with their families. It is a stark contrast to what occurred in the South. The concept of Prison didn't exist except as housing for those waiting to be sentenced to death until about 1790, before then was labor for the public works. The penitentiary system was created in 1790, then in our nation's capital, by the Quakers who opposed the shedding of any blood. It was quite Byzantine in nature modeled after throwing people away into isolation and silence in the monastery-and contrary to western Christian values-and resulted in boundless deaths and cases of insanity. This instrument of terror that deprives people of logos became a favorite for other state governments as a way to deter crimes by punishing activities with no victim, and as a means to raise revenue.
When you ask the question of why does the common criminal have a right to medical care, food, shelter, etc, but a homeless person does not. For one thing, we have abolished private party slavery, although some have argued that historically salary is the same thing and I would agree. So for a homeless person, the old answer could be to sell yourself into slavery, or in the modern sense: get a job. Of course, for many getting a job isn't enough these days to escape homelessness. Slavery also used to be a punishment for crimes, save for the elderly who might be exempt due to age. So treating criminals better than the lawful homeless is because we a mix of a modern byzantine/Catholic monstrosity of disappearing undesirable people (rivals to the crown) to the monasteries, and the arcane notion of a duty to be better than papists to those we have in our care preserved in the 8th amendment that isn't enforceable for the most part these days. And when we remember the left kicking religion out of our schools under the establishment clause, and politics out of our churches, right in our nation's capital, right after the ratification of the constitution, these prisoners stuck in silence and isolation were allowed one human contact; a chaplain to convert them to Christianity. When it comes to the many jurist philosophies, it pretty much is a roulette wheel that we'll end up with. Obviously, Originalism didn't prevail in the establishment clause (which came into effect in 1791), while the originalist philosophies backing sovereign immunity have no historic constitutional origin. These Duties of a Christian nation, like our bill of rights, have been shredded by federalist jurists over the decades. The dignity of a state doesn't concern itself with how it abides to natural, civil, or human rights, but its ability to handle its own affairs. If a State became functionally Nazi Germany, the federalist jurists would be cheering them on giving them immunity all the way singing the crown can do no wrong all the way.

For Over 200 years Georgia had operated where the County Sheriff was an independent county actor and when there was a conflict between the sheriff and the county, that the dispute would be heard in the state superior court. The state of Georgia gave the Sheriff and the county sovereign immunity for state tort claims, but they never gave the county sheriff sovereign immunity for federal claims. Even former state Attorney Generals conceded that the sheriff was a county Agency. They were liable under Monell v department of social services for their deprivation of constitutional rights. In Mander's v Lee the 11th circuit started to use an activity based model, identifying the activity as either being a state or county activity. They found that the use of force by the Sheriff was a state activity and gave the Sheriff office sovereign immunity even if they have policies where they beat the snot out of inmates-And they do. Sovereign immunity when there are no state funds involved-the very purpose of sovereign immunity. The Sheriff can also have policies that foster their deputies committing rape, and still be immune from suit. And Georgia has not allowed their courts to hear claims against the county sheriff either.

The Mander's court, an en banc (full court), left open that the sheriff was still liable for delivering essential life necessities such as food, water, blankets, medicine. In a 3-panel decision of Lake v Skelton, William Pryor decided to reverse the en banc decision. 3-panel decisions do not have that authority to reverse en banc decisions. Pryor expanded upon the activity-based concept and declared that everything is a state function, and ignored all the case laws, Attorney General's opinions, and statutes that specifically point out that the Sheriff is a county agency. Suddenly, the GA sheriff was off the hook for providing food, medical, water, blankets, and every civil rights activity not previously defined-such as due process, exercise, attorney-client privileges. So began a new alarming chapter of sovereign immunity which has led to the deaths of so many.

-Intercircuit Judge Parker dissenting in Lake v Skelton I
and judge parker quoted below.

In the Lake case, they denied Lake a religious diet for over a year-excluding a 3 month period where he was hospitalized. He was arrested for daring to appeal a kangaroo court unconstitutional prior restraint, and held a total of 20 months with no bond set. In 9 months he had dropped from about 180 pounds down to under 140, and was diagnosed at the hospital as malnourished and emaciated. The forcefully removed [for other reasons] chief magistrate judge expected Lake to break his religious vow, his own counsel did nothing for him except stab him in the back, his law library access was only about an hour or two a month, his pro-se filings were a legal nullity, the state supreme court ignored his letter about him being starved, the superior court judge Lark Ingram ignored the medical finding that he was being starved-or she planned to use starvation to force him to plead guilty. The law library books were on matters of state law, not federal. It took about 5-6 months to file a federal civil rights case pro-se-the books available in the law library were for state matters, and needless to say to file IFP you need a jailors affidavit of funds which takes 3 weeks, photocopies another month. By filing for an injunction he was finally allowed a vegetarian diet, a year and one day after being locked up. Lake was highly educated but not a lawyer. And dear Leslie Lynn Arsenault, do you enjoy knowing how much harm and how many lives your inability to tell the truth has cost. All the time the jail could have provided a vegetarian meal at no extra cost from the vendor. This is what Wellstar's Hospitals health director David Howell said and did. Wellstar was not the hospital that ultimately allowed Lake to eat.

Cough, he Got Qualified immunity.
Sounds almost as bad as China. But word of it gets out, but obfuscated in pacer paywalls. Wellstar hospital professionals will literally watch you starve yourself to death rather than accommodate your religious rights for basic health necessities. When I previously mentioned the Maccabees. There are two instances where the Old testament antichrist Antiochus IV tried to force Jews to Eat Pork. Only Antiochus didn't want them to starve to death, he executed an elder who stood to his faith, and slew a family that stood to theirs. When we turn to Leviticus 4:9 We see that the old testament antichrists were more merciful than the highly qualified people so beloved by the federal courts these days.

source:biblehub

And this is what I mean about the importance of the bible in a judicial philosophy. Using the bible as a judicial philosophy is about recognizing the limits to put on government, and never allowing a government to exceed those limits. Do you need the bible to set limits? No, but it is a good start in a system where a human authority acts outside of the laws of nature. It is also noted that here, Lake wouldn't even eat an animal to save his life. While Lake would have dined with serial killers if they had provided him a vegetarian meal on his court days, they instead chose to let him starve on his court days ultimately for petitioning a state supreme court arguing the superior court was unlawfully gagging him.

There is a reason why I bring all these things up, and all that I speak of comes from the cobb county adult detention facility. Not every evil can be timely remedies through an injunction, and the ordinary person only hears about the courts-but rarely knows what to do with them. For many people, they need an emergency injunction and don't know the criteria or how to petition for one, but it might take a month to review the IFP application, on top of the month wait to get photocopies. For people with immediate medical needs, they are just going to drop dead.
And that is what is happening. When it comes to medical attention, you do not have time to wait for the courts involved. Time matters, and if you don't get the healthcare you need in a timely fashion then you risk dying. But these people are in jail you say, being under observation, surely they can help if they needed it. Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself. It takes about 3 weeks for a medical request to go through. So if you ask for a "cold pack" for your current cold, you'll probably get it after you catch another cold. If you went to the hospital and require future rehab as to avoid your medical condition getting worse, they'll tell you that you were told the exercises (when you haven't) and future care will be denied, and if you have a medical emergency. Well, you'll have to wait in a hallway for a few hours until they have staff to bring you to the infirmary. And if you are in the Infirmary, they'll just watch you starve to death, slide your food through piss and expect you to eat it, if you are pregnant and immobile and need water they expect you to crawl for it. And when you litigate the courts will try to find every means they can to give qualified and sovereign immunity.
At best the office of the sheriff can be sued in equity. Without monetary damages in tort, then when a controversy has ended the suit in equity is dismissed. A suit can be dismissed on grounds that a fix has been made, a plaintiff has been transferred or pleaded out....or in the case of Cobb County, they die. When the ACLU suddenly took an interest in the happenings of the Cobb County Jail, they been ignoring them for years. They told the AJC that what is happening there is cruel and unusual punishment. Lancaster v. Monroe County, Alabama, 116 F.3d 1419, 1425 n.6 (11th Cir. 1997) held that for pre-trial detainees these are not 8th amendment violations, as pre-trial detainees our rights come from the 14th amendment.

source:ajc

And indeed Bell v Wolffish has held that pretrial detainees cannot be punished. The people at the ACLU has cared more about killing babies than it does defending civil liberties. Jails are typically short term holding facilities. But there is no accountability, and they are run worse than the state prisons. Had they been actively protecting inmates, then after 20 years you could expect they would be able to distinguish the difference between an 8th amendment and 14th amendment claim. But they failed, their love of killing babies enabled the Cobb County good ole boys network.

Hogan v Wellstar:

Federal Judge Judge Richard Story gave each party qualified and/or Sovereign Immunity. And all she got was a dead baby, and likely also paying their attorney fees for a few thousand or tens of thousands of dollars. A dirty little secret about what happens when Immunity is granted is prevailing party attorney fees.

There are many nightmares that go on. One where a man was denied his anti-anxiety medication, and he kept walking around in circles in the jail pod until he had a stroke. He was supposed to undergo rehabilitation but never happened. He was another person falsely arrested but beat his charge. No suit to my knowledge. These are stories I learned about in 2013 or prior, the immediate below is not the 2019 deaths. But we Observe how mass casualties due to a wanton indifference of civil rights was inevitable.

Another Man was receiving his dinner when an inmate worker kicked the feeding door closed severing his finger. No liability.

One man developed a bacteria infection that caused his hair to fall out. It took the standard 3 weeks before he was seen and treated by the infirmary. No suit to my knowledge.

One man was deathly sick with pneumonia. The Sheriff released him to stick him for his medical as to avoid the expense, then when he unexpectedly recovered they booked him in again sticking him with the cost. Reportedly the Judge [Bloom] was so Irate he dismissed the case against him. I never learned the inmate's name but was at court when it happened. Also if he did die, that is one way for the Georgia Sheriff to avoid saying he died in custody.

Another Inmate became physically injured with what he thought was a nerve injury. He repeatedly asked for medical help, none was granted. Inmates had to physically help him grab his meals, to use the toilet. The jail kept ignoring him until he started to puke blood. The jail had, over the course of a year, been giving him the wrong dosage of his medication and reportedly his liver started to fail.

Another inmate was cleaning out the black mold in the shower pod. He developed a fungal infection in the lungs and they refused to treat it. It was only later that he went to prison that he was able to have it treated.

One man was booked in who had bladder cancer, and the jail refuses to allow him to go to his appointments. He would pee blood, but they would ignore it. He had to write letters to jail officials that if they weren't going to treat him to take him out to Marietta square to be hanged.

The cobb county police broke another inmate's leg. He was having problems with his splint and took it off, they sent him to general population where he was bunked up a flight of stairs. He was later sent back to the infirmary by one of the few deputies that cared about inmates. I am not aware of a suit.

The high profile case of Leonard Swanagan left notes on the state trial court docket claiming that the Jail refuses to send him to medical appointments, that they only deal with trial matters. Leonard Swanagan beat the false indictment in a petition for a new trial by inadequate assistance of council. He filed an exculpable document to the court and put it on record that proved his innocence, but his attorney never brought the evidence to a trial so he was convicted and sent to prison. The D.A. dropped the charge on the motion for a new trial. There was a section 1983 filed, but I am not sure of the nature of the suit.

There was another instance of a man attacked by the police while in handcuffs that resulted in injuries. He was supposed to go to rehab, but the jail refused. No suit that I am aware of.

One man was held in jail for 7 months and took a plea to boot camp. The jail doesn't offer any exercise nor allows inmates to go outside which allowed his muscles to weaken and atrophy. He collapsed and broke his teeth, and was reportedly diagnosed as having muscle tissue in his liver. No suit that I am aware of.

There are other old cases where inadequate medical care has lead to deaths. The jail also mixes people with clear signs of severe mental disorders which escalates the chance of violence. Including one man who at night, locked in a room with another man, strips naked and paces around the tiny cell. How would you feel if you were locked in a tiny cell at night with a naked (presumable convict) pacing back and forth. Closing your eyes, as much as you don't want to see it, might be more dangerous than dropping the soap.

So now we turn to 2019. A year after the SCOTUS denied a writ certiorari in Lake v Skelton. First inmates start dropping like flies at the Rockdale jail, but that would be nothing compared to Cobb County where just a few weeks ago it was reported 7 inmates died this year alone. One by suicide, the others by lack of medical care. People are outraged, the ACLU finally pretends to give a care, the death rate may be the highest out of all the jails in the country. CNN and the big media are silent.

These types of Abuses are what the big media wants. Re-education centers to renounce all that we value dear or our other beliefs, and using any means in order to get it including torture, disappearing people, extorting people, and even medical murder. You need not to anything wrong; they, especially the Cobb County good ole boy network, will cook up evidence to use against you or use the Joe Biden star chambers the same way the house of Stuart did. Communist and federalist are both statists hostile to our natural rights. They hate the individual, they hate opposing ideas, and they will sacrifice as many people as they need to get their heart's content.

Why why is this post directed at the 11th circuit and not Cobb county, not the state of Georgia. The State of Georgia had acquiesced to allowing the federal court to handle constitutional abuses by the sheriff. It is debatable if the state legislatures are even aware of what happened in Lake v Skelton, let alone have time to tell the 11th circuit to back off.

Can Lake v Skelton be reheard? Sadly the answer to this is above my abilities. The petitioner Lake acting pro-se did petition the court to certify the question of sovereign immunity to the state supreme court, but the federal judge Mark Cohen didn't find any authority to do so. So the matter is before the inter American council of human rights. Outside of a rare OAS movement, A new challenge will have to come up, probably from a different circuit, and get the SCOTUS to decide the answer of sovereign immunity for the sheriffs in general. Although each state has their own unique system, the 11th circuit uses an activity based model while the other circuits use an entity based model. So there is a chance that jurisdictional differences may lead to a SCOTUS review.

As Far as Cobb, yeah if I could I'd drop a nuclear weapon on them. Well no, it would be tempting to do so. The current aged sheriff is caught up in a scandal, and will likely choose his replacement in the next election cycle. It is a whole culture that has to be changed, the whole good ole boy network that infests Cobb County and much of the power in Georgia and to a large degree the feds, needs to be destroyed. There are two safeguards. The statist USDOJ who will even go so far as donate money to actual racist cops and the other is the federal and appellate court. Scotus Review is almost unheard of. So the people in the 11th circuit are screwed.

If you or your loved ones want to live as individuals in the south, then you have to remove the federalist at the 11th circuit. Unfortunately the democrats are too busy trying to impeach Trump, rather than the congress or the usdoj working to correct the judiciary. Their failure to act is killing people, and despite each one being paid 6 figures a year they are too thirsty for power to care about the people. So by extension, how long do you really think this nation will last.