You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Vlog 307: European Union might ban the use of memes because of copyrights. Could frictionless royalty payments be possible on a blockchain? + Steempay 0.3

in #life7 years ago

That's stupid, memes are fair use because they are satire, if you just used the image unedited perhaps they would have a claim but the whole point of a meme is to mock something by altering something else, memes are satire. A meme is no different from a Weird Al Yankovic song.

On the other hand I would like to see the EU try it. That would be interesting.

Sort:  

spot-on.

And news paper satire cartoons.

I just said something similar thing, but you were first. Therefore I give you an upvote. :)

Steempay Steem Is The Free Paypal Of The Cryptocurrency Steemit World

Why? Because users can buy more for less as Steem curreny is virtually free money that anyone can earn on Steemit.com.
Moreover, sellers can sell more to buyers that have easy Steem money.
Unlike Paypal customers who pay with hard-earned fiat currency, Steempay customers can very easily earn more Steem currency by simply creating more quality blogs on Steemit.

Steempay is a win-win proposition for Steem buyers and sellers alike.
SteemPay is the world's easiest digital currency wallet.

And unlike Paypal, with the SteemPay wallet, your passwords and money remain in your control at all times. Your keys never leave the device and the code is 100% open source.

On the other hand I would like to see the EU try it. That would be interesting.

Only thing that would get harder would be banning cryptos. I'm a big advocate of copyrights and patents. But just like any other great tool like nuclear energy etc. it can be used for very destructive means and that's what these idiots have been doing for some time (with patent trolls and other scum)

They need to understand why copyrights even exist in the first place. Copyrights let the creators make money off of their creations. It's pretty much like having a bounty on something. there is a lot of incentive to create and creators can be self sufficient without sponsors.

EU needs to get schooled on fair use.

The meme police will be kicking down doors across the continent while the bus stations become rape rooms.

"They need to understand why copyrights even exist in the first place. Copyrights let the creators make money off of their creations. "

Exactly, no one is going to confuse a meme with the movie it came from nor will it prevent the author from making money off of it. No one is going to stop making movies lest a frame becomes integrated into a meme.

Don't you know, the mayor of Cologne has figured out way to stop all of that. Girls just need to keep the men at arms length. If the women can't outrun them, that's her failure as a human being.

That video points out the motivation and justification they use, guilt
you colonized these people long ago therefor now they can colonize you and if you say shit it is hate speech.

Hello @funbobby51, and nice to Steem you! :-)

Well, as far as I know nor in the United States of America nor in the European Union the copyright laws allow royalty-free use of a material on the basis of the satirical, parodic or humorous intention of the "second hand" author, and I guess it partially derives from the interpretation margin which would arise from such a subjective claim (a same artwork may be seen as a parody from its content creator point of view, and as a plain political or social statement from other viewers opinions).

In case it doesn't exist yet, and following your suggestion, it'd be beneficial to promote the adoption of a "humorous" Creative Commons licence attribution :-)

Upon further reading I will change my argument to say that memes are parody.

Parody is very strongly protected while satire is less so but still protected.

https://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/intellectual/roundtables/0506_outline.pdf

they note that:

satire that does not target the original work can be considered fair use if, for instance, there is little possibility that consumers would view the satire as a commercial substitute (§ 107(4)), or if only a small amount of the copyrighted work was used (§ 107(3)).
C

I think a single frame from a movie that has been turned into a meme satisfies both of those conditions.