You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Symbiont{s} | Anti-Abuse Initiative | Steem Sentinels
Just to make it clear from the start. We will never run or support any code regardless of its technical feasibility (transaction refusal) which will directly or indirectly endanger the immutability of the chain and the property of all its users.
Well that promise went away pretty fast. Good to see more liars in the top 20!
Unless.
e. Defend our home against malicious actors, spam, abuse, and disinformation.Again. We at symbionts, we strongly support the following:
We are committed to making Steem more decentralized by working on fixing governance so that nothing like this can happen in the future. Things will settle again once the chain is stabilized, and a system to fight abuse against former (malicious) actors is properly implemented. As you can see, we cannot improve things while others are having fun in their destruction, we are working hard on a daily basis to rebuild The Steem ecosystem, something was really needed to mitigate the abuse as much as possible until we are out of the transitional phase.
Know that you are always welcome to reach out to us if you want to share some ideas or discuss something in a respectful way. We are really open to discussion, suggestions, and contributions.
Thank you for passing by @carn,
It's sad to see, that people who we choosed to protect us - are not indeed destroying chain which they were supposed to protect. It's like voting on your goverment and then seeing all major politicians moving to neighbouring country, making new alliances and saying 'whoever stays - dies' :/
That's partly how I feel
Not only should they focus on those who are openly attacking the ecosystem, but the correlation between user accounts must be well studied. Maybe we have "trojan horses" within the community that could then give us some new unpleasant surprises.