You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: HF 20 - lessons finally learned?
So far I have not seen any T20 witness with serious answers.
Everything went fine, steem on!
That seems the Motto of the day.
Not one opposed the HF20.
That is a full consensus.
All their testing and review went fine.
What can we low and even lower witnesses do in the future to avoid such major issues?
Testing. There's no need to be a witness to test changes. Of course top witnesses has much better chances for doing that because of their resources (some like me are running plenty of steemd instances), but as you can see, not everything can be predicted and not always tests reveals potential issues. That's what we can and should improve.
https://steemit.com/steem/@inertia/re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-hardfork-20-what-to-expect-tomorrow-20180925t032945094z
I hope next time there will be a real testnet available and not one still running on the last version..
Not much... be more vocal, and hope it's appreciated by those who decide in the background maybe?
If I am vocal, some are complaining, I would always complain.
If there is need in proper service management, I could be of service.
A secret non T20 witness channel to have our own background decisions maybe?
:))
I fear criticism will be hushed down, you are not entitled to say anything.. Or make it better.. Or even, if you don't like it here, why don't you leave it.
But after every release one should look for weak spots, improvements, etc.
What are the next steps towards SMTs?
Any Roadmap there?
That isn't even an argument.. Because is it really better to go with a bad hf20 towards SMTs?
Instead of delay them and work it out?
Looks more like big cooperations behavior.