You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Governance is Multiparty
It’s as unsubstantiated as you not owning @freedom and you not being Satoshi. You can’t disprove a fact that doesn’t exist.
Your point is invalid in relation to DPoS. And it’s alarmingly lame by in a backwards way accusing me of lying.
Come up with something worth doing something over or solutions to real problems, or come up with new governance structures.
Stakeholders vote for Witnesses. End of story here in DPoS.
The fact is that we don't know who @freedom is. You've made unsubstantiated claims and I've pointed them out for what they are.
Your conclusions in your OP are to ask the community focus on something that can’t be proven to any of our benefit and is based on FUD. Thanks for nothing there.
I've written my comments to speak my mind on an important aspect of Steem.
How can I help you?
Sure! I would appreciate an answer to this question I've asked here.
Source
Your questions imply the rules were changed. The rules weren’t changed.
Steemit Inc chose the people with the most nominations. The post said they would select 4 winners at random. It then said random drawing.
How is choosing the people with the most nominations a random drawing?
10 FREE ways to choose a random winner
Who votes on the steemit Inc CEO?
Genuine question.