Freedom is not owned by Steemit Inc nor it’s employees.
These are unsubstantiated facts. If you have proofs of who @freedom is, then feel free to reveal them publicly. As of now, it remains unknown who @freedom is and thus my points remain valid.
I could hardly believe he tried to use that one and essentially try to tell me I am lying. I know what he's trying to get at -- something about DPoS really -- or making demands on others in a system he opted into -- but I don't think he has articulated it to himself yet.
Then note your “we” does not include me. Assuming despite refutation that I don’t know freedom is no one in this company is asinine. Beyond that there’s plenty of argument for DPoS that it doesn’t matter who Freedom or Blocktrades are. All the parties youve been complaining about are Stakeholders. DPoS is held together by Stakeholders’ Incentives and Pareto Principle despite Tragedy of the Commons. Understand that first.
What you know and what you've stated didn't invalidate any of the points I've made in my first comment. Also, I didn't complain about any Stakeholders. I've merely stated facts.
Is it a fact that it’s all an “issue” as you stated? I’ll stop bothering to respond to you if you believe you’re stating facts only while not doing that — that’s contradictory and a waste of my time.
Your conclusions in your OP are to ask the community focus on something that can’t be proven to any of our benefit and is based on FUD. Thanks for nothing there.
A lack of evidence disproving your claim doesnt make it evidence that your claim is accurate.
I could hardly believe he tried to use that one and essentially try to tell me I am lying. I know what he's trying to get at -- something about DPoS really -- or making demands on others in a system he opted into -- but I don't think he has articulated it to himself yet.
You could be lying. This isn't out of the realm of what is possible. Acting as we know something we actually ignore is foolish.
Is there a mouse in your pocket?
No.
Then note your “we” does not include me. Assuming despite refutation that I don’t know freedom is no one in this company is asinine. Beyond that there’s plenty of argument for DPoS that it doesn’t matter who Freedom or Blocktrades are. All the parties youve been complaining about are Stakeholders. DPoS is held together by Stakeholders’ Incentives and Pareto Principle despite Tragedy of the Commons. Understand that first.
What you know and what you've stated didn't invalidate any of the points I've made in my first comment. Also, I didn't complain about any Stakeholders. I've merely stated facts.
Is it a fact that it’s all an “issue” as you stated? I’ll stop bothering to respond to you if you believe you’re stating facts only while not doing that — that’s contradictory and a waste of my time.
It’s as unsubstantiated as you not owning @freedom and you not being Satoshi. You can’t disprove a fact that doesn’t exist.
Your point is invalid in relation to DPoS. And it’s alarmingly lame by in a backwards way accusing me of lying.
Come up with something worth doing something over or solutions to real problems, or come up with new governance structures.
Stakeholders vote for Witnesses. End of story here in DPoS.
The fact is that we don't know who @freedom is. You've made unsubstantiated claims and I've pointed them out for what they are.
Your conclusions in your OP are to ask the community focus on something that can’t be proven to any of our benefit and is based on FUD. Thanks for nothing there.
I've written my comments to speak my mind on an important aspect of Steem.
How can I help you?
Sure! I would appreciate an answer to this question I've asked here.
Source
Your questions imply the rules were changed. The rules weren’t changed.
Steemit Inc chose the people with the most nominations. The post said they would select 4 winners at random. It then said random drawing.
How is choosing the people with the most nominations a random drawing?
10 FREE ways to choose a random winner
Who votes on the steemit Inc CEO?
Genuine question.