Is It So Hard for having a Stage Environment for Steem Blockchain
We have witnessed some of the issues on the HF20 release. Now in teh perfect software world we will have Development Environment where all the developers code will go for the first round of testing, then we have the Stage Environment where the date will replicate as that of Prod but the code is of development to check if the new release will function properly in the live environment. Then comes Prod when everything is working perfectly fine in Stage, we deploy to prod.
Now this cycle should be repeated for every releases whether the release is a small or a big one. Now HF20 was a big release and might be it was tested also, the only thing makes me wonder is that how come such thing gone unnoticed in the release. If the testing did not happen properly or the testing is not done on the prod data. Whatever is the case but HF20 release was not smooth and people involved should take care of it from the next time.
Sadly this is the only popular social "decentralized" platform that is workable :( I meant "used to work"
As you can see, the HF20 just got new patches that make the RC system better and actually usable. I think we had to move into some better Bandwidth system which is more fair. In the previous system it was possible that users that have less than 50 SP were not able to transact anything, while 60 SP users could spam as they wanted. The transition to the new system was very bad. But in the long term, it is a progress and I hope it will only get better.
Hi @codingdefined!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 5.157 which ranks you at #843 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 726 contributions, your post is ranked at #556.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server