RE: KURE Curation Community Network - Update 10 - Comments! View, Write and Post Comments!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: KURE Curation Community Network - Update 10 - Comments! View, Write and Post Comments!

krnel (78)in #utopian-io • 6 years ago

Can you explain the evaluation? You seem a lot tougher on your judgment. It's the first time I've gotten below 75 I think...

"The post is of decent quality."

What would be a high quality post for you? I've scored high on all of the other posts where I take the time to put images and explain things. The first one or two I wasn't as descriptive.

"Average - it follows most best practices."

I'm curious, what have I forgotten to do this time around? I've gotten highs on all my previous posts.

For the commits and comments, do you have suggestions for what I should do to improve them? This time I admit the comments I didn't put @params for all of the functions, but the commits I try to describe them as I have before, and gotten rated as "high".

Thanks for helping me improve.

6 years ago in #utopian-io by krnel (78)

$0.00

Sort:

Trending

[-]

justyy (82) 6 years ago (edited)

Hello, don't be upset, 73 is still very high (in my standard). I think you can improve your next contribution in the following area:

unit tests. No tests are found to cover your changes. I would expect to see tests in any size of the projects, not to mention this one.
some comments are not necessary, for example, Sort the Comments, comments should be clear and add additional values.
The errors shown to console when users are not login (as I mentioned earlier) ==> indicates that the code can be improved in terms of robustness.

Don't take these as criticisms, you are already doing very good job and I am hoping to see more from you soon.

$0.00

11 votes

[-]

krnel (78) 6 years ago (edited)

Thanks, I will take that into consideration. What about "The post is of decent quality."? You didn't answer me on that point. Your review and that of 3 other reviewers in utopian don't match on that category, as they all rate the posts I make as "high".

Look at my first post that got an "decent" rating:

https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@krnel/kure-development-update

It's much different than this above post, and all the others before that (update 2-9).

Look at all the other posts where I increased the quality of the post, and got a "high":

And then look at this post you reviewed again. Why does it fall into "decent" when it is of high quality like all the others (except the first post)? I don't understand how you can rate it as "decent" only. Please elaborate on why you judged it as only decent, in contrast to 3 of your colleagues who rate my post quality as high.

Thank you.

$0.00

[-]

justyy (82) 6 years ago

I understand your points. The decent and high are quite subjective, that depends on the opinions of the reviewer. I am sorry that I felt it is ‘decent’ which is still very good.
Utopian does not have a clear guidance on when to rank ‘decent’ and when to rank ‘high’, if there is, and if it is a very clear criteria I am sure every reviewers will follow and mark the same.

$0.00

10 votes

[-]

krnel (78) 6 years ago

Ok. I had asked previously "What would be a high quality post for you?" Can you show me a high quality post so I know what I need to do?

If there is no criteria from utopian for this category of quality post, how does one judge it one way or another?

Thanks.

$0.00