This is correct, however, I would try to tell it in a couple more ways.
Women and Men are opposite but complimentary. Everyone seems to accept that statement, and then turn around and make assumptions that men and women have the same goals and drives and thinking.
Third wave feminism is one of the most evil things to ever hunt females. Mostly because the feminists not only ignore the above, but actively seek to destroy it. Which ends up with women either ignoring their power, or systematically abusing it. (Where have all the good men gone? Well, they were destroyed by feminists.)
Men have an excess of strength. A woman by herself can feed herself and a bit more. A man can feed a family. (speaking of farming in specific) A man only has to expend about 40% of his energy to sustain his life. If he has no greater purpose, than that is all he will expend.
Another explanation is that men love women, women love children. Children need food/shelter so a woman loves a man indirectly for the ability to provide for children. This gives a woman an incentive to get a husband, and a man an incentive to get a wife. But if you mess with this dynamic, such as giving the kids and the resources to the woman in a divorce. The divorce is a win-win for women, and a lose-lose for men. This is why women need to understand the power they have, and understand the destruction this multiplying affect can have.
It is because men love women that feminist rhetoric works at all. There is a group of men who have tried feminist rhetoric back on women, and it fails utterly. Such as 1 in 5 homeless people are women. This gets people fired up to do something about it. 4 out of 5 homeless people are men doesn't even get a peep.
Women love opportunistically. Men love romantically. If you don't understand these two views, then you are liable to believe the reverse is true. To show this, look at some common perceptions. Women often talk about how looks are the only important thing to men. From a woman's opportunistic point of view, this seems logical. But, if we look at the facts we get a different story. A group of men were shown a random group of photos and asked if they would date or not. The result, about 80% of women are date-able. Compared to about 20% of men being considered date-able by women.
Some very bad misunderstandings happen because of the assumption that male power and female power are the same.
Obviously you are correct in more than one ways, but I didn't want to increase the ratios of darkness by adding the vices of modern relationships... I was sure someone would write them though ahahaha... :D
In a way, the evolution of relationships had a dual effect. You get something but you also lose something. In the past, when marriages due to love were scarce (that's if it was even a choice of the man and woman - and not their families who chose for them) the catalytic benefit of men getting the force-multiplying effect was much scarcer also.
The relatively new widespread ability of men and women to freely engage in relationships of their own choice, based on criteria like attraction, can greatly increase the force-multiplying abilities. A man will be way more motivated by a woman he is actually very attracted to, than not.
At the same time, the ability of women to choose, based on more hard-"cold" criteria, is the tradeoff. And from there we have a whole sort of problems arising for relationships.
I won't generalize issues like who wins through a divorce, because these are highly region-specific, depending the legal framework in place, but in some countries of the west it's definitely a very unbalanced equation. It is also unbalanced in some developing countries or backward-oriented countries, where women have much fewer rights. As societies, we need to find the optimum regarding these.
Indeed. This gives me a good opportunity to add that if there is something similar to how men can amplify their force through women, that's how women can amplify their force through their children. The motivation of a mother to protect their child can create circumstances of force-multiplication that could be similar to how a man can amplify his own power by being motivated by a woman. That can also be seen in the animal kingdom as well. A cat protecting her kitten can beat even 5 large dogs going after the cat's home.
If this reality is a virtual reality, then I'm pretty certain that these man-woman, woman-child, animal mother-animal children relations are all similarly "coded" as equations that involve the multiplication of power.